Fix the damn ready


Far from the 1960s American promise of a nuclear family – a heterosexual couple, their 2-3 children, and a stable, unionized job with guaranteed retirement – students now face a complex and troubling prospect. Today, many American students and recent graduates are faced with huge student loans, a fence to economic mobility in the United States.

Not only is excessive lending a reason students drop out, but more than half of graduates with debt say their loans lowered their credit rating and forced them out. delay save for emergencies. Unfortunately, the weight of this burden weighs on minority communities. Specifically, black college graduates on average to have to $ 25,000 more than their white counterparts. These diverse students have fewer employment opportunities, which contributes to the fact that rates are 36% and 49%, respectively, among Hispanic and black borrowers, compared to just 21% among whites.

This is a US crisis affecting the way 53% of borrowers choose their careers. It also decreases entrepreneurship and overall economic consumption while precipitously increasing household indebtedness, and problem is only getting worse, with student debt slowly encroaching on overall household spending.

In 2019, the average student owed $ 30,062 upon graduation, which represented an increase of about 26% over the past decade. In addition, the average college graduate in 2019 makes $ 53,889 per year. The average loan Payment is $ 393 per month, which means the average graduate uses 8.75% of their annual salary to pay off their loan. On top of that, recent graduates of color have typically less opportunities for young graduates.

Now, while it’s easy to dismiss this as a problem that plagues some people who have been conned into signing unaffordable loans, it is in fact a systemic failure that has turned into a crisis that threatens our economy. on several levels. At the micro level, college dropouts do 35% less than graduates, who, in 2011, was rising to $ 3.8 billion per year in lost wages and probably more in lost economic output. At the macro level, the federal government holds $ 1.5 trillion in student loan debt, which represents 29.8% of all assets. Holding these high-risk assets is cost taxpayers $ 170 billion from 2017 to 2026. The current trajectory of this crisis, particularly due to the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, is untenable. Our government must formulate a comprehensive and multi-pronged approach to alleviate this looming crisis and develop more opportunities for economic mobility through education.

Now, many at the federal level have spent a lot of time and effort to address the issue, especially proposals of Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., And Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., For student debt cancellation. While these two admirable efforts would make the problem better than it currently is, there are two main problems.

Primarily, the idea is politically infeasible. But even if it didn’t, it would only offer a economic multiplier from 0.08x to 0.23x, which are both low returns – especially compared to infrastructure spending which provides a 1.6x multiplier in a recession. Instead, many at the more moderate end of the spectrum have chosen to advocate for modest reforms like increasing the availability of Pell grants or the move from the system to income based repayment of the loan, which would help alleviate the crisis.

That being said, I personally prefer a more market driven solution. Specifically, to free up working capital, the federal government should increase the scope of the current Public service loan remission program. Currently, the PSLF is waiving federal student loans for those who paid off their loans on time and worked for ten years for the government, a nonprofit, AmeriCorps, or the Peace Corps. However, if the government were to expand the program through a public-private partnership, it could significantly increase the number of jobs available to new graduates and reduce the amount of outstanding student debt.

The system could work in four different funding categories: large and medium-sized enterprises (over 100 employees), small enterprises (100 employees and under), 501 (c) (3) nonprofits, and government governments. States and federal agencies. All participating companies must meet certain diversity standards and a minimum wage of $ 15.

In exchange, the federal government would introduce a matching program: providing 50% of the salaries of new hires (up to $ 50,000 per year per employee) in treasury bills in large and medium-sized companies, 75% of the salaries of new hires. (up to $ 75,000 per year per employee) in grants to small businesses and nonprofits and a dollar-for-dollar matching program similar to Medicaid with state governments.

In order to encourage students to embark on small businesses, nonprofits, and government careers, the PSLF requirements would be changed based on category. For small business and government, students are expected to work for seven years. For nonprofits, students would only have to work for five years.

This desperately needed update to the PSLF would free students from the shackles of student loans more quickly while ensuring that lenders of these loans get their capital back. This, in turn, would create a great multiplier whose shock waves would be felt across the country, providing a sustainable roadmap for long-term growth.

That being said, there are plenty of other ways to fix this problem. uniquely American problem, and whatever your ideology, you should research and support a solution to student debt – our elected officials will not fix this problem unless we do.

Keith Johnstone can be reached at [email protected].

The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged us all, including the Michigan Daily, but it hasn’t stopped our staff. We are committed to reporting on the issues that matter most to the community where we live, learn and work. Your donations keep our journalism free and independent. You can support our work here.

For a weekly recap of Michigan Daily’s best stories, sign up for our newsletter here.


Leave A Reply